The Department of Injustice

If anyone had questions about whether Trump would staff the Justice Department with sub moronic bullies, one need look no further than Emil Bove III.

                Bove, Trumps nominee for Deputy Attorney General, served as the acting Attorney General for three weeks following Donald Trump’s inauguration on January 20 and the confirmation of Pam Bondi as Attorney General. During that period Bove commenced a purge of senior officials at the FBI. He ordered a review of thousands of FBI agents who were involved in investigating the insurrection of January 6, 2021. He ordered the firing of agents who were assigned to the probe that was conducted by special counsel Jack Smith into Donald Trump.[1]

At the same time, the acting United States Attorney for the District of Columbia, Edward Martin Jr., another Trump sycophant fired thirty federal prosecutors who worked on the January 6th cases and announced that he would extend his office’s investigation into Democratic leaders and former Justice Department officials.[2]

While all of this was transpiring confirmation hearings for Bondi and Kash Patel, Trumps nominee to be FBI director, were pending before Congress. Both Bondi and Patel repeatedly pledged that no retaliatory firings in either agency would occur and  Patel promised to adhere to the existing procedures for discharging employees as well as due process.[3] During the Biden Administration Patel published a book in which he vowed to close FBI headquarters  and published a list of people who should be prosecuted in the event Trump returned to office.[4] Despite Patel’s testimony the Judiciary Committee received information that he was covertly directing dismissals while his nomination was pending.[5] Notwithstanding this information the Republican majority on the judiciary committee chose to ignore it and advance Patel’s nomination to the Senate for a full confirmation vote.[6]

One does not have to be clairvoyant to understand the strategy here. According to the information received by Senator Richard Durbin ranking member of the Judiciary Committee, Patel had enlisted Stephen Miller, Trumps immigration weasel, and Acting Deputy Attorney General Bove to carry out the purge before he was confirmed, so that he could deny responsibility for them.[7]

While these events were unfolding, Bove got the bright idea to order the dismissal of a criminal case pending against New York City Mayor, Eric Adams, pending in the United States District Court in the Southern District of New York. The ostensible reason for the dismissal was “that the investigation would prevent Adams from cooperating with Trumps immigration crackdown.” In his directive to the Acting United States Attorney for the Southern District, Bove explicitly made it clear that the decision was not based on the evidentiary strength of the case. Moreover, the dismissal would be without prejudice and the Department of Justice would have the option to restore the case and prosecute Adams in the future. Adams would have the prosecution hanging over his head, like the Sword of Damocles, if he failed to sufficiently do Trump’s bidding.

When the Acting US Attorney refused to carry out the directive, Bove fired her, placed several of her assistants under investigation and transferred the prosecution to the Public Integrity Section of the Justice Department. Thereafter prosecutors in that unit resigned rather than carry out the order.[8] Bove gathered all of the remaining lawyers in the public integrity section and threatened dismissal unless someone from the unit signed the motion to dismiss. One senior member of the Section agreed to sign the motion, along with Bove, to prevent the dismissal of all the other prosecutors. A hearing is now scheduled before the Hon. Daniel Ho, the judge presiding over the case.[9] it seems somewhat remarkable that Bove apparently did not know or realize he could sign the motion to dismiss without discharging and jeopardizing all the other prosecutors involved in the case.

While Judge Ho could deny the motion to dismiss, there is no precedent for him to direct the Justice Department to proceed to trial. The hearing nevertheless will be interesting to learn how Bove can justify the Trump dismissal.

 There is a precedent for the judge to conduct such an inquiry. When the Trump Justice Department sought to dismiss the case against Michael Flynn for lying to the FBI, Judge Emmet G Sullivan, Senior Judge of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, conducted a similar hearing and appointed a retired federal judge and prosecutor, John Gleeson to oppose the motion. [10] Before the judge could proceed with Flynn’s sentencing, Trump pardoned Flynn.

Bove is designated to become the deputy to Todd Blanche, his former law partner and who is nominated for the position that Bove now occupies. Bove and Blanche were Trump’s defense lawyers during his “hush money “trial in New York City.

One must wonder about the propriety of Trump’s appointing his defense lawyers to two powerful positions in a department that can prosecute his enemies, carry out his policies no matter how extreme and where their allegiance will always be open to question.

 One might also wonder about the wisdom of appointing two lawyers to these positions that succeeded in getting him convicted of thirty-four felonies.


[1][1] Justice Department Orders FBI Purge, Review of Staff Who touched January 6 Cases.by James Roebuck, Perry Stein, Salvatore Rizzo, Carol D.Leonnig, Washington Post, January 31, 2025.

[2]“DC US Attorney Fires Six January 6 Prosecutors, Launches New Probes,” Washington Post, January 31, 2025

[3] “Trump FBI nominee Patel Questioned on Capital Riot, Retribution Claims,” by Sarah N. Lynch and Andrew Goudsward, Reuters, January 30, 2025.

[4] “People on Kash Patel’s ‘So-Called Enemies List Taking Drastic Steps for Protection Before His Potential FBI takeover,” by Annie Grayer and Marshall, CNN, January 30, 2025

[5] “Sen. Accuses FBI Nominee of Covertly Directing Dismissals,” by Charlie Savage, New York Times, February 11, 2025.

[6] “Trump FBI pick Kash Patel clears Senate panel. Headed for confirmation vote,” by Sarah Ann Lynch Reuters, February 13, 2025

[7] “Durbin Accuses Patel of Ordering FBI Firings Before His Confirmation as FBI Director and lying About It,” by Jacob Rosen, CBS News, February 11, 2025.

[8] “Order to drop Adam’s case prompts resignations in New York and Washington,” by William K Rasbaum, Benjamin Weiser, Jonah E Bromwich, Maggie Haberman, New York Times, February 13, 2025.

[9] “Hearing called on Adam’s Case as Governor. Hochul Questions Mayors Conduct,” by Shayna Jacobs and Jeremy Roebuck, Washington Post, February 18, 2025.

[10] “Judge Sullivan Says He Is Not Required to Rubberstamp DOJ’s Bid to dismiss Flynn Case,” by Anne E Marimow and Carol Leonnig, Washington Post, June 1, 2020.

Trump’s Dachau

                                                On May 10 last year, while Trump was running for President, I published a piece entitled The Rise of the Fourth Reich on this platform. Since then, Trump has been elected to a second term and much of what I predicted in that piece is coming true.

                We are less than one month since his inauguration, and during that time he has announced a massive roundup and deportation of migrants who are in this country. In order to accomplish this task Trump has ordered the construction of a 30,000-bed detention camp at Guantánamo Bay Naval Base in Cuba. This facility would add to the 40,000-detention capacity currently maintained by the US Immigration and Customs Enforcement and is far larger than any existing detention facility administered by ICE.[1]

                the United States has operated the military base in Guantánamo Bay pursuant to a lease with Cuba for more than a century. It is currently best-known for the facility detaining terror suspects following the September 11, 2001, attacks. It currently has a small separate facility that has housed migrants from Cuba and Haiti who were rescued at sea.[2] Trump has wasted no time in utilizing the facility at Guantánamo Bay and 10 migrants recently sent there are occupying prison cells in the facility formerly occupied by terrorism suspects. The Trump administration has justified this form of detention by claiming the ten migrants are part of a Venezuelan gang.[3] Like most claims made by the Trump administration this one remains unverified. In addition to building the massive detention camp at Guantánamo, Trump has expressed interest in sending convicted criminals, including Americans, to prison facilities in El Salvador.[4]

                In 1934 Nazi Germany opened its first large-scale detention camp at Dachau to detain Communists, Socialists, and other opponents of the Nazi regime. Over time Dachau evolved into a concentration camp, a slave labor camp and ultimately a camp dedicated to the extermination of Jews and other select groups held there.[5]

Like Trump and Tom Homan, Trump’s Borders Czar, the Nazis were very vocal about the consequences the Jews would face if they failed to leave Germany and its occupied countries. Adolf Eichmann, the architect, and executor of the ultimate extermination warned the Jewish populations that they would be confined to the camps if they failed to self deport, while at the same time obstructing their ability to leave.[6]

At this early stage it is impossible to predict how all of this will turn out. The United States has leased Guantánamo from Cuba for over a century. Cuba opposes the lease and has rejected all of the United States lease payments in the past. Cuban Government officials are on record criticizing and opposing the decision to imprison migrants at Guantánamo.[7]

Ironically, Trump has invoked unspecified treaty violations with Panama in support of his claim for the return of the Panama Canal.[8] The ultimate irony might be that Cuba seeks to evict the United States and terminate its lease for what appears to be Human Rights violations by imprisoning the migrants at Guantánamo.

It is crystal clear that this policy is motivated by racism. Trump’s long history of racism need not be recounted here. The vast majority of migrants being rounded up and imprisoned are from Latin American countries and Haiti. At the same time, Trump is trying to wrest control of Greenland whose population is overwhelmingly white. Trump has most recently sanctioned South Africa claiming that white South Africans are oppressed and that their property is being unlawfully expropriated. While Black and Latin American migrants are being rounded up for shipment to Guantánamo, Trump has offered to resettle white South Africans in the United States. To their credit the Afrikaners have refused this offer.[9]

Simultaneously, Trump has proposed that the United States seize control of Gaza and permanently remove the entire Palestinian population and turn it into ‘the Riviera of the Middle East.”[10] The Palestinians have categorically rejected this proposal.[11] Trumps Gaza Plan is ethnic cleansing in its purest form.

Ethnic cleansing is considered a crime against humanity punishable in the international criminal Court. Likewise, the mass deportation of migrants pursuant to Trumps plan violates the United States Refugee Act of 1980 which incorporated the 1967 Protocol in the 1951 Convention of the Status of Refugees into our law.

American leaders that implement these plans and world leaders who are complicit in it may find themselves in the dock at a future Nuremberg Trial.


[1] “Trump Plans to Build Mass Detention Camp for Deportees at Guantanamo Bay,” by Nick Miroff and Dan Limoff, Washington Post, January 29, 2025.

[2] “What to Know About Guantánamo Bay, The Base Where Trump Will Send ‘Criminal Aliens,’” by Tim Sullivan, Associated Press, January 29, 2025

[3] “US Is Hlding Migrants in Cells That Once held Al Qaeda Suspects,” by Hamed Aleaziz, Eric Schmitt and Carol Rosenberg, New York Times, February 5, 2025.

[4] “Trump Sys He Would Jail Americans in El Salvador ‘In a Heartbeat.” By Zolan Kanno-Youngs, New York Times, February 4, 2025.

[5] Kogon, Eugene, The Theory and Practice of Hell, Berkley Publishing Corporation, New York, New York (1958).

[6] Evans, Richard J. Hitler’s People: The faces of the Third Reich, Penguin Press, (New York, NY 2024) p.379.

[7] FN2.

[8] “Why the US is Claiming China’s Presence Violates the Panama Neutrality Treaty,” by Marianna Parraga and Elifa Moreno, Reuters, January 21, 2025.

[9] “Trump Says Some White South Africans are Oppressed and Could be Resettled in the US. They say No Thanks. By Gerald Imray, Associated Press, February 8, 2025.

[10] “Trump Proposes US Takeover of Gaza and Says all Palestinians Should Leave,” by Michael D Shear, Peter Baker and Isabel Kershner, New York Times February 4, 2025, updated February 5, 2025.

[11] “I Won’t Leave. ‘Put that in your brain.’ Palestinians Reject Trump’s Call to Expel Them From Gaza,” by Waffa Shurafa, Samy Magdy and Juia Frankel, Associated Press, February 5, 2025.

Shill

                After watching the confirmation hearing before the United States Senate Judiciary committee concerning the nomination of Pam Bondi to become United States Attorney General I endeavored to try and capture a word that best summed up Ms. Bondi. Shill was the only one that seemed to do her justice.

                Bondi became the replacement for the failed and ludicrous nomination of former Congressman Matt Gaetz to this position. While Bondi, by virtue of her service as Attorney General for the State of Florida, appears to be qualified for this position a closer examination of her ties and advocacy of Donald Trump’s specious claims that the 2020 election was “stolen,” along with her tacit endorsement that prosecutors in the Justice Department and Special Counsel’s office in the prosecution of Donald Trump should be targeted for prosecution themselves, renders her unfit for this position.[1]

                Bondi first came to national attention when it was revealed that in 2013, while serving as Attorney General for the State of Florida, she declined to join other state attorney generals in litigation against Trump University and it was further revealed that her political action committee had solicited a $25,000 campaign contribution from the Trump Foundation. The contribution was later determined to be unlawful expenditure by the Trump Foundation.[2]

                Following her tenure as Attorney General of Florida, Bondi became a regular defender of Trump on cable television and during his first impeachment trial. Bondi was also one of Trump’s premier election deniers including refusing to acknowledge that Trump had lost the 2020 election during her confirmation hearing.[3] Indeed, when it came to questions about Trump prosecuting the prosecutors who investigated and charged him, Bondi became the “Artful Dodger,” ducking questions about her own calls for these prosecutors to be charged. In an appearance on Fox News she declared, “you know what’s going to happen. The Department of Justice, the prosecutors will be prosecuted, the bad ones. The investigators will be investigated. …They were hiding in the shadows. But now they have a spotlight on them and they can all be investigated, and the house needs to be cleaned out. Because now we know who most of them are; there is a record of it, and we can clean house next turn, and that’s what has to happen.”[4]

                If one needs a barometer to gauge how influential and independent Bondi will be if confirmed, one needs only look to her testimony during her confirmation hearing about the prospect of pardons for the January 6 insurrectionists. In response to questions about whether she would recommend pardons to Trump, she responded that “she condemned ‘any violence’ against law enforcement officials but added that she had not reviewed the files from those cases and would need to ‘ look at each case and advise on a case-by-case basis.’”[5] Five days later, apparently without any consultation or input from Bondi, Trump issued a blanket pardon to all January 6 insurrectionists and directed the Department of Justice to dismiss all pending cases.

                Bondi’s nomination and likely confirmation to be the United States Attorney General confirms two beliefs that I have long held. First, is that there are people who are successful in politics that could never be successful in anything else. Second, is that simply because someone has been elected to public office does not mean they are the best qualified for that office.

                Following her tenure as Attorney General of Florida, unlike most individuals leaving such a position, she did not join a prestigious law firm. Instead, she joined a lobbying firm that included Susie Wiles, Trump’s incoming Chief of Staff and became a “talking head” on Fox News.

                Surely, the Nation can do better for its eighty-seventh Attorney General.


[1]“What to Know about Trump’s Attorney. General Pick Pam Bondi as she faces questioning on Capitol Hill,” Alanna Durkin Richer, Associated Press, January 15, 2025.

[2]“Pam Bondi a $25,000 Donation and Trump University: Questions Remain,” by Eric Lipton, New York Times November 22, 2024.

[3] “How Pam Bondi Boosted Trump’s Election Fraud Claims in a Key Swing State,” by Beth Reinhard, Washington Post, December 16, 2024

[4]“ it’s not just Kash Patel. Many Trump Picks Have Suggested Retribution.” Aaron Blake, Washington Post, December 23, 2024.

[5] “AG pick Bondi Says No Enemies List Won’t Rule Out Probes of Trump Foes,” Jeremy Roebuck and Mark Berman, Washington Post, January 15, 2024